I’ve said before that my biggest fear for the Seahawks this season is what I see as a lack of ability to stretch the defense from the WR corps. It’s the main reason I’m pulling for DJ Hackett to make the team (and get some PT). And it’s the reason why, all other things being equal, I would’ve preferred the Hawks to go after Peerless Price instead of Peter Warrick.
Len Pasquarelli has all the contract details on ESPN.com, including the incentive breakdown. He correctly notes the similarities between Warrick and Bobby Engram and adds at the end that Warrick was “never as fast as advertised when he came out of college.” Warrick is not a downfield receiver.
Peerless Price, on the other hand, was a deep threat when he had his breakout year in Buffalo. The problem with Price is that he struggled in Atlanta in the West Coast offense — which is what the Hawks run, of course. Surely the team felt he might not be the right fit, even if his skill set is something the Hawks need on paper.
Then there’s that new attitude in Kirkland (which I support wholeheartedly), where Good Guys are desired and Troublemakers are not. Warrick was loved by teammates; Price was not. And lastly, there’s the Tim Ruskell factor. Ruskell obviously got the chance to know Price a bit during their short time together in Atlanta, and that — above all other factors — is probably what kept the Hawks from ever expressing an interest in Price. Which leaves me, as a guy not really into Peter Warrick, in the position of having to trust Ruskell that this is a better fit than Price.
So … what happens at the WR spot now?
At the News-Trib’s blog, Mike Sando speculates these will be the 6 keepers: Jackson, Engram, Warrick, Jurevicius, Bannister, and Hackett.
|