Archive for November, 2004

Ty Willingham / UW

Tuesday, November 30th, 2004 by Matt

Ivan Maisel touches on this briefly in ESPN.com’s article about ND firing Ty Willingham, but the longer version is this: it was reported today on Dan Patrick’s ESPN Radio show that UW contacted Ty Willingham two weeks ago about becoming the Huskies’ head coach.

Yes — two weeks ago is what Dan Patrick said. Aren’t there rules in college against contacting coaches mid-season? Two weeks ago the Irish were preparing for USC.

That said, I like Willingham and think he would be a good fit at UW.

And as a Notre Dame fan, I must say that it’s a bit sad to see the university treating its football coaches like … well, like UW and every other football school out there.

|

Butch Davis / UW

Tuesday, November 30th, 2004 by Matt

Butch Davis has resigned as coach of the Cleveland Browns, and speculation is that he’ll be a candidate for the Florida Gators job. It would be wise for the Huskies to give him a call and ask about coming west. They could do a lot worse.

|

Seahawks

Monday, November 29th, 2004 by Matt

Where to even begin?

Some random thoughts:

  • No, Holmgren doesn’t deserve to be fired. For starters, the timing isn’t right. You don’t can your head coach in the middle of the season when you’re leading your division.
  • Besides, I haven’t seen Holmgren drop a pass or miss a tackle yet this year, have you?
  • And don’t go off about play-calling unless you’ve sat in the team meetings during the week and broken down the opponent’s tendencies in every situation. Besides, the play-calling would seem excellent if the players would just EXECUTE. This is a player’s league — when you have the players and they execute properly, you win. When you don’t … well, just ask Bill Parcells. It’s not like he’s suddenly become stupid…..
  • It is Holmgren’s job, however, to have the team prepared to play and they looked completely unprepared on Sunday. If this continues over the final 5 games, win or lose, then I’ll change my mind about Holmgren’s status as head coach.

    More non-Holmgren random thoughts:

  • Our special teams are simply awful.
  • I think when the season ends, we will learn that Hasselbeck is more seriously injured than anyone has let on. I’m not concerned about the poor stats – his numbers would be great if guys would catch the ball – but I am concerned about how many passes I’ve seen that are just flat out off the mark. Balls are thrown too far in front or too far behind guys, balls are bouncing at their feet, etc. This is not what we saw from him last year and in the final 5-6 games of 2002. He’s better than this, and I suspect there’s something health-related that no one’s talking about.
  • Despite the three INTs Sunday, our secondary has been average at best the past couple weeks. That’s due in part to the lack of a pass rush, which is due in part to the fact that the defense has been on the field way too much, which is caused by the offensive ineptitude, so….

    In the end, it all comes down to the offense. When the offense is on, the defense is better, and the Seahawks win. But the offense can’t get “on” when we drop a half-dozen balls a game. It’s time to give Jerheme Urban a bigger role, and time to see what guys like Jason Willis and Taco Wallace can do. You can’t run a ball-control, West Coast system when your QB doesn’t want to throw to the WRs because they’re not catching the ball.

    If you’re optimistic, this Monday Night game may be just what they need to have a fire lit under their collective arses. If you’re pessimistic, you think it won’t make a difference. Here’s my take: Monday night is a MUST WIN for the Seahawks. They are too fragile right now to survive a home loss on MNF to the lowly Cowboys.

    |
  • Boulware ROY? Huh?

    Saturday, November 27th, 2004 by Matt

    I’m not sure which is dumb and which is dumber: the Seattle Times for asking if Michael Boulware is the rookie of the year right now, or the 59% of the people who’ve said YES.

    Has no one heard of Ben Roethlisberger? It’s not even a race at this point…..

    |

    Delgado AND Sexson?

    Saturday, November 27th, 2004 by Matt

    Someone please tell me Finnigan has it wrong. Please…….?

    |

    My Seahawks season seat

    Saturday, November 27th, 2004 by Matt

    Seahawks-Dolphins 11-21-04
    Originally uploaded by The Fan.

    There she is! What a thing of beauty. Seat #18, right on the aisle in section 123. And seat #17 is mine, too — that’s my bud Phil with his arse in the other seat.

    Love the view, but if I do season tickets again next year I will try to get down closer to the field, I think. These seats are in the crotch of Qwest Field — i.e., where the sun doesn’t shine — and it was freezing with no sun light on us.

    I’ll dress a lot more warmly tomorrow for the Bills game……

    Meanwhile, I have posted 8 pix from last Sunday’s game in our “The Fan” Flickr group:

    The Fan @ Flickr

    And anyone else with game photos, or pictures at all related to what we cover here on The Fan — you are welcome to join Flickr and share your photos with the group.

    |

    Meanwhile, the Sonics…

    Wednesday, November 24th, 2004 by Matt

    … just keep on winning. Minor speed bump with the loss to Boston (I think) the other night, but a great win tonight at Minnesota.

    They’re getting bench production, they’re shooting well from beyond the arc, and tonight – on the road, mind you – they committed only 9 turnovers (to Minnesota’s 17) and 18 fouls (to Minnesota’s 24). They made 25 of 26 from the FT line. That’s just good basketball.

    McMillan is correct in saying “it’s a long season” as he did after the win tonight, but it’s starting to look pretty obvious that my recent prediction of a sub-30 win season will be off the mark.

    Let’s not start talking about the Sonics as an elite team, but it’s time to start asking this question: At what point do we have to consider them “for real”?

    |

    Welcome back … to me

    Wednesday, November 24th, 2004 by Matt

    Season Tickets – the view
    Originally uploaded by The Fan.

    Finally back in the saddle after a great weekend with a good friend and occasional blog contributor (Phil) visiting from Baltimore. The weekend included Sunday’s Hawks-Fins game, which was also my first opportunity to actually use my own season tickets.

    So here’s the view from section 123, up top real close to the big Jumbotron screen. I like it, but if I get season tickets again next year I’ll probably try to move down closer to the field. I like 123 — there’s a lot of energy from all the nutters in the end zone seating. Just want to be a bit closer.

    Maybe more thoughts later on the game … but it wasn’t pretty. Dilfer looked like a guy who’s only taken one snap all year. We just didn’t seem to bring much energy to the field — at least on the offensive side.

    On the bright side, we saw that Jerry Rice can still catch the ball, and while he’s not gonna outrun anyone these days, I think he’ll make some valuable contributions while K-Rob is suspended.

    I’ll be heading back Sunday for the Bills’ visit, and hoping that one’s more enjoyable to watch, and with the same result.

    |

    Seahawks reality check

    Friday, November 19th, 2004 by Matt

    I know there’s an attitude out in Seahawk Nation that the sky is falling. And frankly, I don’t get it. The Seahawks are 5-4 and in a 1st-place tie in their division. Now if the Seahawks were a team of New England’s stature, or even a team like the Eagles or Colts, then this doom and gloom would make perfect sense. But these are the Seahawks were talking about; we’re not exactly the Yankees of the NFL.

    The problem is as much the expectations as anything right now. We were pegged by some overzealous Jimmie-the-Greek wannabes as a Super Bowl contender. And I’ll admit to wanting to believe the hype as much as anyone reading this. But what was it based on? Nothing more than the fact that we backed into a wild card slot last season (when the Cowboys lost in Week 17) and then almost upset the Pack at Lambeau. Compare that to the Eagles string of NFC Championship Game appearances, and the addition of Terrell Owens, and ask yourself which team was more deserving of the preserving hype? Yes, the Eagles got more than the Seahawks, but that we got any at all seems foolhardy to the objective eye, doesn’t it?

    So you have to ask yourself, those of you who feel the sky is falling: What were your honest expectations at the 9-game mark? Let’s look at this game-by-game as if it were still the pre-season:

    Week 1 @ New Orleans: optimistically you could hope and think this could be a win, but you couldn’t count on it after the awful road record we put together last year. 50/50 on this one.

    Week 2 @ Tampa Bay: this is a loss. No way the Hawks beat the Bucs on the road.

    Week 3 vs. SF: this is a win. It’s a home game and the 49ers were known to be awful coming into the season.

    Week 5 vs. St. Louis: 50/50 here, since it’s the Rams. But we edged them at home last year, so let’s call it a win.

    Week 6 @ New England: loss

    Week 7 @ Arizona: win

    Week 8 vs. Carolina: Even though it’s a home game, you figure this to be a loss because this is the defending NFC champ bringing back their whole roster with another year of experience (Steve Smith, Stephen Davis, etc.). You figure this is where the home winning streak ends.

    Week 9 @ SF: another win, the 49ers are that bad

    Week 10 @ STL: loss.

    So after 9 games, with a brutal schedule that has only 3 of those games at home, how could you realistically figure the Hawks to be any better than 5-4, or optimistically 6-3? You couldn’t. But what’s infuriating, I realize, is that two of the current 4 losses should’ve been wins — STL #1 and Arizona. So yeah, you’re thinking “we could be 7-2″ but we’re not, so the sky is falling. But you can’t think that way, because for every game that should’ve been a win, there’s another that should’ve been a loss. How about Tampa Bay? We sucked wind that day and had no business getting a win. And you can bet that one of these upcoming games will be a win we don’t deserve. It all evens out in the end. (Speaking of which, if the Seahawks play to potential it appears the only iffy games left are at Minnesota and at the Jets. I’m figuring that last game against Atlanta is a win because the Hawks should have the NFC South wrapped up by then and won’t want to run Vick out there, esp. if it’s an important game for the Hawks.) I’m optimistic that 10-6 / 11-5 is well within reach, and that’ll be plenty for the playoffs.

    My point here is this: The sky isn’t falling. At 5-4, we’re pretty much where any sane Seahawks fan would’ve pegged us for this point of the season. It’s almost Thanksgiving and we’ve only played 3 home games. The W-L record isn’t cause for concern. But if you need to be worried about something to feel right inside, worry about the injuries. That’s where things are looking their worst.

    |

    Holmgren slammed

    Wednesday, November 17th, 2004 by Matt

    This should lead to some discussion from at least the anti-Holmgren crowd…

    Phil shares this quote from St. Louis Post writer Bernie Miklasz, writing in the Post’s message forum:

    “Why does Holmgren continue to elude criticism as he cruises along in his sixth season in Seattle with a mediocre overall record of 46-43? He’s winless in his last four playoff games. His team blew a 27-10 lead in a humiliating loss to the Rams earlier this season. And on Sunday, Holmgren got nearly 200 yards from Shaun Alexander, saw his defense limit the Rams to nine points over the final 51 minutes, 51 seconds and still couldn’t win. And Holmgren is a genius?”

    I have some thoughts on this and on Holmgren in general which I’ll try to post in the next day or two, but anyone wishing to comment can have at it now. Try to remain intelligent. We’re aiming higher than sports radio-level commentary here. :-)

    |